<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 1489 -  ITAT RANCHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461777</link>
    <description>ITAT Ranchi allowed assessee&#039;s appeal regarding Section 40(a)(ia) addition for hire charges paid without TDS deduction. Following Vector Shipping decision and SC precedent in Vegetable Products Ltd., tribunal held Section 40(a)(ia) applies only to unpaid amounts at year-end, not payments made during the year. Regarding bogus expenses, tribunal upheld CIT(A)&#039;s restricted disallowance noting assessee disclosed 5% profit margin reasonable for transportation business. Higher depreciation rate of 30% for trucks and excavators was allowed following ITAT Kolkata precedent. CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of diesel expense addition was upheld as payments were for legitimate business purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 19:07:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=817962" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 1489 -  ITAT RANCHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461777</link>
      <description>ITAT Ranchi allowed assessee&#039;s appeal regarding Section 40(a)(ia) addition for hire charges paid without TDS deduction. Following Vector Shipping decision and SC precedent in Vegetable Products Ltd., tribunal held Section 40(a)(ia) applies only to unpaid amounts at year-end, not payments made during the year. Regarding bogus expenses, tribunal upheld CIT(A)&#039;s restricted disallowance noting assessee disclosed 5% profit margin reasonable for transportation business. Higher depreciation rate of 30% for trucks and excavators was allowed following ITAT Kolkata precedent. CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of diesel expense addition was upheld as payments were for legitimate business purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461777</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>