<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 1446 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461782</link>
    <description>The Bombay High Court admitted the appeal on substantial questions of law concerning disallowance of amortized swap cost on unmatured contracts and the applicability of section 14A to interest received by Indian branches from head office. It also admitted the additional ground on whether section 14A could be applied to such branch-head office interest, leaving the merits of those issues for determination in the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 19:07:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=817957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 1446 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461782</link>
      <description>The Bombay High Court admitted the appeal on substantial questions of law concerning disallowance of amortized swap cost on unmatured contracts and the applicability of section 14A to interest received by Indian branches from head office. It also admitted the additional ground on whether section 14A could be applied to such branch-head office interest, leaving the merits of those issues for determination in the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461782</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>