<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (1) TMI 117 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43259</link>
    <description>Where existing relief was insufficient to secure meaningful utilisation of import licences, further consequential directions were warranted. The Court directed issue of subsidiary licences for AM 83 after finding the denial justified, and ordered revalidation of the subsidiary licences for AM 84 to AM 88 for a further six months because the earlier revalidation period was inadequate for effective use. The additional relief was treated as necessary to make the earlier order practically effective, and the appeal succeeded with the order modified accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 10:30:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81788" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (1) TMI 117 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43259</link>
      <description>Where existing relief was insufficient to secure meaningful utilisation of import licences, further consequential directions were warranted. The Court directed issue of subsidiary licences for AM 83 after finding the denial justified, and ordered revalidation of the subsidiary licences for AM 84 to AM 88 for a further six months because the earlier revalidation period was inadequate for effective use. The additional relief was treated as necessary to make the earlier order practically effective, and the appeal succeeded with the order modified accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43259</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>