https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43258 Orders confirming excise demand and withdrawing the benefit of duty-free procurement of sulphuric acid were quashed because the petitioner was not given a personal hearing before the adverse action was taken. The rejection of objections without a fair opportunity to substantiate the case was held to offend the requirement of fair procedure. The matter was directed to be reconsidered afresh after granting an opportunity of hearing. en-us Thu, 03 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Jun 2010 10:28:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43258 Orders confirming excise demand and withdrawing the benefit of duty-free procurement of sulphuric acid were quashed because the petitioner was not given a personal hearing before the adverse action was taken. The rejection of objections without a fair opportunity to substantiate the case was held to offend the requirement of fair procedure. The matter was directed to be reconsidered afresh after granting an opportunity of hearing. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 03 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43258