https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43256 The Madras High Court interfered with a Tribunal's pre-deposit condition after finding that the petitioners' financial hardship had not been properly weighed. Although the Tribunal had noted limited immovable property and adverse financial condition, it still required a substantial deposit, which the Court held was an improper exercise of discretion in the circumstances. The Court modified the condition by reducing the pre-deposit and directed that, on compliance, the appeal would be heard on merits. The impugned order was therefore set aside subject to deposit of the reduced amount within the stipulated time. en-us Mon, 13 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Jun 2010 10:25:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43256 The Madras High Court interfered with a Tribunal's pre-deposit condition after finding that the petitioners' financial hardship had not been properly weighed. Although the Tribunal had noted limited immovable property and adverse financial condition, it still required a substantial deposit, which the Court held was an improper exercise of discretion in the circumstances. The Court modified the condition by reducing the pre-deposit and directed that, on compliance, the appeal would be heard on merits. The impugned order was therefore set aside subject to deposit of the reduced amount within the stipulated time. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 13 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43256