<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1524 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769610</link>
    <description>An order passed under Section 74 of the GST Act was quashed where the parties were ad idem that the matter should be sent back so the taxpayer could be heard. The High Court remitted the matter to the adjudicating authority for fresh decision after granting an opportunity of hearing, ensuring that the taxpayer could place its case before a new adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 08:35:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=817818" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1524 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769610</link>
      <description>An order passed under Section 74 of the GST Act was quashed where the parties were ad idem that the matter should be sent back so the taxpayer could be heard. The High Court remitted the matter to the adjudicating authority for fresh decision after granting an opportunity of hearing, ensuring that the taxpayer could place its case before a new adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769610</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>