<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1497 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769583</link>
    <description>Interference with the High Court&#039;s refusal to grant writ relief was unwarranted because the petitioner had been left free to seek rectification under section 154. The availability of that statutory remedy was treated as sufficient for correction in accordance with law, so no ground was found to disturb the High Court&#039;s approach. The challenge was therefore rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2025 16:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=817770" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1497 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769583</link>
      <description>Interference with the High Court&#039;s refusal to grant writ relief was unwarranted because the petitioner had been left free to seek rectification under section 154. The availability of that statutory remedy was treated as sufficient for correction in accordance with law, so no ground was found to disturb the High Court&#039;s approach. The challenge was therefore rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769583</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>