<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1504 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769590</link>
    <description>HC condoned 108-day delay in tax appeal, finding petitioner&#039;s rectification petition a bona fide attempt to resolve the issue. The court set aside the dismissal order, directing appeal be heard on merits upon deposit of 5% of disputed tax demand. The ruling emphasizes judicial discretion in considering genuine reasons for procedural delays and prioritizing substantive justice over technical impediments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 21:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=817763" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1504 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769590</link>
      <description>HC condoned 108-day delay in tax appeal, finding petitioner&#039;s rectification petition a bona fide attempt to resolve the issue. The court set aside the dismissal order, directing appeal be heard on merits upon deposit of 5% of disputed tax demand. The ruling emphasizes judicial discretion in considering genuine reasons for procedural delays and prioritizing substantive justice over technical impediments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769590</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>