<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1506 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769592</link>
    <description>Non-payment of the mandatory pre-deposit under the CGST Act led to dismissal of the statutory appeal, but the Court accepted that the default was inadvertent and permitted compliance in the interest of justice. On payment of the requisite pre-deposit, the appellate authority was directed to restore the appeal and hear it afresh on merits after giving the petitioner due opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 17:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=817761" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1506 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769592</link>
      <description>Non-payment of the mandatory pre-deposit under the CGST Act led to dismissal of the statutory appeal, but the Court accepted that the default was inadvertent and permitted compliance in the interest of justice. On payment of the requisite pre-deposit, the appellate authority was directed to restore the appeal and hear it afresh on merits after giving the petitioner due opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769592</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>