<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1507 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769593</link>
    <description>The HC upheld the validity of tax notifications and assessment order under Section 168A of CGST and TNGST Acts. The Court found the extensions for tax compliance rational and constitutional, rejecting challenges to the government&#039;s powers. The notifications were deemed legally sound, not violating fundamental rights under Articles 14 and 19(1)(g), and the assessment order was considered procedurally compliant. The writ petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 08:35:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=817760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1507 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769593</link>
      <description>The HC upheld the validity of tax notifications and assessment order under Section 168A of CGST and TNGST Acts. The Court found the extensions for tax compliance rational and constitutional, rejecting challenges to the government&#039;s powers. The notifications were deemed legally sound, not violating fundamental rights under Articles 14 and 19(1)(g), and the assessment order was considered procedurally compliant. The writ petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769593</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>