<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1519 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769605</link>
    <description>Personal hearing under section 75(4) was treated as mandatory before passing the assessment order under section 73. Because the petitioner was not afforded that opportunity, the assessment order was found unsustainable. The appellate order dismissing the appeal also failed, as it was merely consequential to the defective assessment. The matter was remanded to the assessing authority for a fresh decision after granting an opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 08:35:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=817748" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1519 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769605</link>
      <description>Personal hearing under section 75(4) was treated as mandatory before passing the assessment order under section 73. Because the petitioner was not afforded that opportunity, the assessment order was found unsustainable. The appellate order dismissing the appeal also failed, as it was merely consequential to the defective assessment. The matter was remanded to the assessing authority for a fresh decision after granting an opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>