<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (5) TMI 23 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43244</link>
    <description>Goods imported under a special import policy for domestic use may still be treated as prohibited for export where the policy scheme, headings, and operative conditions show by necessary implication that re-export in the same state is outside the permission granted. Clearance for home consumption under the Customs Act, 1962 is not, by itself, an absolute bar to later export; however, the relevant Open General Licence and policy language governing life-saving equipment intended for use in India did not contemplate export outside India. On that construction, attempted re-export attracted confiscation under Section 113(d) and penalty under Section 114.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2025 16:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81773" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (5) TMI 23 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43244</link>
      <description>Goods imported under a special import policy for domestic use may still be treated as prohibited for export where the policy scheme, headings, and operative conditions show by necessary implication that re-export in the same state is outside the permission granted. Clearance for home consumption under the Customs Act, 1962 is not, by itself, an absolute bar to later export; however, the relevant Open General Licence and policy language governing life-saving equipment intended for use in India did not contemplate export outside India. On that construction, attempted re-export attracted confiscation under Section 113(d) and penalty under Section 114.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43244</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>