<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (4) TMI 86 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43237</link>
    <description>The court upheld the procedure followed by Bombay Customs as just and equitable, directing Kandla Customs to permit further mutilation at the port if required. The rule was made absolute for Special Civil Application No. 1698 of 1988, allowing clearance of goods after compliance with the directions. The other two petitions were dismissed as the goods had already been cleared.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 09:48:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81766" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (4) TMI 86 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43237</link>
      <description>The court upheld the procedure followed by Bombay Customs as just and equitable, directing Kandla Customs to permit further mutilation at the port if required. The rule was made absolute for Special Civil Application No. 1698 of 1988, allowing clearance of goods after compliance with the directions. The other two petitions were dismissed as the goods had already been cleared.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43237</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>