<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (1) TMI 153 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43236</link>
    <description>Composite plastic administration sets fitted with catheter, needle and clamp were held not to be mere articles of plastic, because they had a distinct commercial identity and use and were understood in the market as administration sets; they were therefore classified under the residuary tariff entry rather than the plastic articles entry. On limitation, the extended excise demand was unavailable because the department already knew the manufacturing process and the notice did not allege fraud, collusion, wilful mis-statement, suppression of facts or intent to evade duty. Recovery was confined to the normal six-month period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 19:00:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81765" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (1) TMI 153 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43236</link>
      <description>Composite plastic administration sets fitted with catheter, needle and clamp were held not to be mere articles of plastic, because they had a distinct commercial identity and use and were understood in the market as administration sets; they were therefore classified under the residuary tariff entry rather than the plastic articles entry. On limitation, the extended excise demand was unavailable because the department already knew the manufacturing process and the notice did not allege fraud, collusion, wilful mis-statement, suppression of facts or intent to evade duty. Recovery was confined to the normal six-month period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43236</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>