<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 947 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461768</link>
    <description>In this case, the SC examined a dispute involving contractual obligations and breach of agreement. The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, finding that the defendant had materially breached the contract&#039;s terms. The decision established that substantial non-performance constitutes a valid grounds for contract termination and damages. The ruling reinforced the principle of good faith and fair dealing in contractual relationships, providing clear guidance on interpreting contractual obligations and remedies for breach.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2025 11:17:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=817625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 947 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461768</link>
      <description>In this case, the SC examined a dispute involving contractual obligations and breach of agreement. The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, finding that the defendant had materially breached the contract&#039;s terms. The decision established that substantial non-performance constitutes a valid grounds for contract termination and damages. The ruling reinforced the principle of good faith and fair dealing in contractual relationships, providing clear guidance on interpreting contractual obligations and remedies for breach.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461768</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>