https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769471 A writ challenge to cancellation of an allotment under a public authority involved a sufficient public law element, so contractual remedies did not bar judicial review of alleged arbitrariness. The allotment letters and lease deeds were treated as part of one composite transaction: the allotment terms survived only where not altered by the lease deeds, and the authority's independent statutory power of resumption remained available. Applying proportionality, the cancellation was examined against repeated defaults, prior lesser measures, unpaid dues and project non-compliance, and was found primarily rooted in non-payment. The court also addressed protection of homebuyers, sub-lessees and financial institutions through consequential directions. en-us Mon, 10 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Apr 2025 12:23:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769471 A writ challenge to cancellation of an allotment under a public authority involved a sufficient public law element, so contractual remedies did not bar judicial review of alleged arbitrariness. The allotment letters and lease deeds were treated as part of one composite transaction: the allotment terms survived only where not altered by the lease deeds, and the authority's independent statutory power of resumption remained available. Applying proportionality, the cancellation was examined against repeated defaults, prior lesser measures, unpaid dues and project non-compliance, and was found primarily rooted in non-payment. The court also addressed protection of homebuyers, sub-lessees and financial institutions through consequential directions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 10 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769471