<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1389 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769475</link>
    <description>HP HC ruled that respondent&#039;s industrial unit, despite being in the negative list, was not entitled to concessional central sales tax rate of 1.5% under notification dated 01.04.2013. The court distinguished the Lloyd Electric case, emphasizing that judicial observations must be read in context and not as statutory provisions. The notification clearly excluded negative list units from concessional rates effective 01.04.2013. Assessment imposing CST at 2% with interest and penalty was upheld as valid. Appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2025 08:30:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=817560" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1389 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769475</link>
      <description>HP HC ruled that respondent&#039;s industrial unit, despite being in the negative list, was not entitled to concessional central sales tax rate of 1.5% under notification dated 01.04.2013. The court distinguished the Lloyd Electric case, emphasizing that judicial observations must be read in context and not as statutory provisions. The notification clearly excluded negative list units from concessional rates effective 01.04.2013. Assessment imposing CST at 2% with interest and penalty was upheld as valid. Appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769475</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>