<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1399 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769485</link>
    <description>Workers&#039; entitlement to wages for a layoff period preceding commencement of CIRP arose from pre-CIRP labour-law facts, so the insolvency forum was not the proper for adjudicating that entitlement. Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code bars enforcement and execution of claims, but does not prevent determination of the quantum of dues. The question whether salary was payable for the layoff period could be pursued before the appropriate labour forum. The Resolution Professional was justified in computing the claim only up to the layoff period, and the Adjudicating Authority declined interference with that computation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2025 08:30:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=817550" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1399 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769485</link>
      <description>Workers&#039; entitlement to wages for a layoff period preceding commencement of CIRP arose from pre-CIRP labour-law facts, so the insolvency forum was not the proper for adjudicating that entitlement. Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code bars enforcement and execution of claims, but does not prevent determination of the quantum of dues. The question whether salary was payable for the layoff period could be pursued before the appropriate labour forum. The Resolution Professional was justified in computing the claim only up to the layoff period, and the Adjudicating Authority declined interference with that computation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769485</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>