https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769489 A personal guarantor could not avoid service of a guarantee invocation notice by objecting only to the address used, where receipt of the notice was not specifically denied and related notices were received at the same address. The notice was therefore treated as duly served. Limitation for the Section 95 IBC application was also held to be extended by written acknowledgements in balance sheets made within the limitation period, because such acknowledgements attract Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963 and, under the guarantee deed, bound the guarantor. On both service and limitation, the challenge failed and the impugned order was affirmed. en-us Tue, 22 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 26 Apr 2025 08:30:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769489 A personal guarantor could not avoid service of a guarantee invocation notice by objecting only to the address used, where receipt of the notice was not specifically denied and related notices were received at the same address. The notice was therefore treated as duly served. Limitation for the Section 95 IBC application was also held to be extended by written acknowledgements in balance sheets made within the limitation period, because such acknowledgements attract Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963 and, under the guarantee deed, bound the guarantor. On both service and limitation, the challenge failed and the impugned order was affirmed. Case-Laws IBC Tue, 22 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769489