https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769505 Delhi HC upheld the government notification dated 17 November 2006 prohibiting contract labour employment at Central Warehousing Corporation's Inland Clearance Depot. The court found that contractual work was necessary for the industry, perennial in nature (same workers employed since 1985), ordinarily performed by regular employees at similar establishments, and sufficient to employ considerable full-time workers (around 300 annually). The court determined the Central Advisory Committee on Labour applied proper consideration under Section 10(2)(a) of the relevant Act, rejecting petitioner's challenge of non-application of mind. Petition dismissed. en-us Thu, 24 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 26 Apr 2025 08:30:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769505 Delhi HC upheld the government notification dated 17 November 2006 prohibiting contract labour employment at Central Warehousing Corporation's Inland Clearance Depot. The court found that contractual work was necessary for the industry, perennial in nature (same workers employed since 1985), ordinarily performed by regular employees at similar establishments, and sufficient to employ considerable full-time workers (around 300 annually). The court determined the Central Advisory Committee on Labour applied proper consideration under Section 10(2)(a) of the relevant Act, rejecting petitioner's challenge of non-application of mind. Petition dismissed. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 24 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769505