https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769505 A prohibition notification under the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 was challenged for alleged non-application of mind and failure to consider the Section 10(2) factors. The HC held that the appropriate Government had examined the advisory board's report, sought additional information, and considered relevant material on wage disparity, lack of leave and medical benefits, bonus, the nature and duration of the work, longstanding deployment of the same labour force, continuing volume of work, and comparable regular performance in another establishment. It further held that the work need not be a core activity for Section 10(2)(a), and that speculative business concerns did not displace the statutory assessment. The notification was therefore upheld. en-us Thu, 24 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 26 Apr 2025 08:30:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769505 A prohibition notification under the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 was challenged for alleged non-application of mind and failure to consider the Section 10(2) factors. The HC held that the appropriate Government had examined the advisory board's report, sought additional information, and considered relevant material on wage disparity, lack of leave and medical benefits, bonus, the nature and duration of the work, longstanding deployment of the same labour force, continuing volume of work, and comparable regular performance in another establishment. It further held that the work need not be a core activity for Section 10(2)(a), and that speculative business concerns did not displace the statutory assessment. The notification was therefore upheld. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 24 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769505