<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1422 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769508</link>
    <description>ITAT Mumbai allowed multiple appeals across assessment years 2004-05, 2006-07, and 2007-08. The Tribunal deleted disallowances of depreciation on demerged assets following coordinate bench precedent, allowed software expenses as revenue expenditure, and deleted travel expenses for foreign executives&#039; business visits. The Tribunal confirmed 2% disallowance under section 14A for dividend income and upheld exclusion of 90% royalty income from section 80HHC profits computation. Several issues were restored to AO for fresh examination including VRS compensation claims, advances written-off, annual letting value determination, and section 50C additions. The Tribunal directed consistent stock valuation methods and rejected dividend distribution tax claims under DTAA provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2025 08:30:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=817527" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1422 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769508</link>
      <description>ITAT Mumbai allowed multiple appeals across assessment years 2004-05, 2006-07, and 2007-08. The Tribunal deleted disallowances of depreciation on demerged assets following coordinate bench precedent, allowed software expenses as revenue expenditure, and deleted travel expenses for foreign executives&#039; business visits. The Tribunal confirmed 2% disallowance under section 14A for dividend income and upheld exclusion of 90% royalty income from section 80HHC profits computation. Several issues were restored to AO for fresh examination including VRS compensation claims, advances written-off, annual letting value determination, and section 50C additions. The Tribunal directed consistent stock valuation methods and rejected dividend distribution tax claims under DTAA provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769508</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>