https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461753 Mere delay in acting on a representation seeking interest on a refund does not, by itself, justify invocation of contempt jurisdiction. Where the grievance is limited to non-immediate compliance with an earlier court direction, contempt proceedings are not maintainable unless there is more than delay and the conduct amounts to disobedience warranting contempt. On these facts, the contempt petition was held not maintainable and was dismissed. en-us Wed, 13 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Apr 2025 18:56:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461753 Mere delay in acting on a representation seeking interest on a refund does not, by itself, justify invocation of contempt jurisdiction. Where the grievance is limited to non-immediate compliance with an earlier court direction, contempt proceedings are not maintainable unless there is more than delay and the conduct amounts to disobedience warranting contempt. On these facts, the contempt petition was held not maintainable and was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 13 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461753