<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 1481 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461757</link>
    <description>A writ challenge to a show cause notice raised questions on the issuing officer&#039;s jurisdiction and issuance beyond the extended limitation period. Because jurisdictional defects and maintainability in writ proceedings can be examined without resolving disputed facts, the matter was found suitable for adjudication on merits after exchange of affidavits. The writ petition was restored to the Single Bench for decision on merits, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 18:56:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=817434" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 1481 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461757</link>
      <description>A writ challenge to a show cause notice raised questions on the issuing officer&#039;s jurisdiction and issuance beyond the extended limitation period. Because jurisdictional defects and maintainability in writ proceedings can be examined without resolving disputed facts, the matter was found suitable for adjudication on merits after exchange of affidavits. The writ petition was restored to the Single Bench for decision on merits, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461757</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>