<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (10) TMI 54 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43214</link>
    <description>A bail order may be challenged and reconsidered under the Code of Criminal Procedure, including through inherent jurisdiction, where justice requires; the application was maintainable. An earlier bail order was treated as having exhausted itself once the complaint was filed and the matter entered a fresh procedural stage, so it was no longer operative merely because the accused had not yet been released. In offences governed by the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, stringent bail restrictions prevailed, and humanitarian considerations could not override them; on the facts, bail was not justified on merits and the Sessions Court&#039;s order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 17:42:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81743" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (10) TMI 54 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43214</link>
      <description>A bail order may be challenged and reconsidered under the Code of Criminal Procedure, including through inherent jurisdiction, where justice requires; the application was maintainable. An earlier bail order was treated as having exhausted itself once the complaint was filed and the matter entered a fresh procedural stage, so it was no longer operative merely because the accused had not yet been released. In offences governed by the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, stringent bail restrictions prevailed, and humanitarian considerations could not override them; on the facts, bail was not justified on merits and the Sessions Court&#039;s order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43214</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>