<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>UNDER SECTION 73 ORDER DROP UNDER SECTION 73/74 AGAINST PAYMENT OF GST AND INTEREST. THEN DEPARTMENT ISSUED NEW NOTICE UNDER SECTION 74 IN DRC01A.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119927</link>
    <description>A prior show cause under Section 73 was followed by payment via DRC-03 and the proceedings were dropped; a fresh DRC-01A notice under Section 74 now seeks to reopen the same period. Section 73 applies to non-fraudulent shortfalls while Section 74 requires material showing fraud, suppression, or willful misstatement. Absent distinct new evidence of fraud, re-initiating under the fraud provision is legally untenable and may amount to abuse of process; the advised response is a DRC-06 reply and a representation to the proper officer, with judicial review as a last resort.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 18:54:45 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 11:02:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=817424" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>UNDER SECTION 73 ORDER DROP UNDER SECTION 73/74 AGAINST PAYMENT OF GST AND INTEREST. THEN DEPARTMENT ISSUED NEW NOTICE UNDER SECTION 74 IN DRC01A.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119927</link>
      <description>A prior show cause under Section 73 was followed by payment via DRC-03 and the proceedings were dropped; a fresh DRC-01A notice under Section 74 now seeks to reopen the same period. Section 73 applies to non-fraudulent shortfalls while Section 74 requires material showing fraud, suppression, or willful misstatement. Absent distinct new evidence of fraud, re-initiating under the fraud provision is legally untenable and may amount to abuse of process; the advised response is a DRC-06 reply and a representation to the proper officer, with judicial review as a last resort.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 18:54:45 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119927</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>