<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (2) TMI 86 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43205</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the previous orders and remanded the case for fresh consideration regarding the interpretation of Section 4 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The petitioners were directed to provide evidence, and the second respondent was instructed to reevaluate the claims for deductions on post-manufacturing expenses in line with court guidelines. The inquiry was to be completed promptly, with the petitioners&#039; bank guarantee remaining in effect until the final resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 17:21:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81734" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (2) TMI 86 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43205</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the previous orders and remanded the case for fresh consideration regarding the interpretation of Section 4 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The petitioners were directed to provide evidence, and the second respondent was instructed to reevaluate the claims for deductions on post-manufacturing expenses in line with court guidelines. The inquiry was to be completed promptly, with the petitioners&#039; bank guarantee remaining in effect until the final resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43205</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>