https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769399 A plaint in a bare injunction suit founded only on an agreement to sell against third parties must be read as a whole, and it may be rejected at the threshold if it discloses no cause of action or is barred by law. An agreement to sell does not create right, title or interest in immovable property; it gives only a personal claim against the vendor, and Section 53-A of the Transfer of Property Act cannot be used against a third party. Where the plaintiffs are only agreement holders, the vendors are not parties, the defendant is in settled possession, and no declaration of title is sought despite a cloud on title, the injunction suit is legally untenable. Rejection under Order VII Rule 11(a) and (d) is warranted. en-us Wed, 16 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Apr 2025 08:53:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769399 A plaint in a bare injunction suit founded only on an agreement to sell against third parties must be read as a whole, and it may be rejected at the threshold if it discloses no cause of action or is barred by law. An agreement to sell does not create right, title or interest in immovable property; it gives only a personal claim against the vendor, and Section 53-A of the Transfer of Property Act cannot be used against a third party. Where the plaintiffs are only agreement holders, the vendors are not parties, the defendant is in settled possession, and no declaration of title is sought despite a cloud on title, the injunction suit is legally untenable. Rejection under Order VII Rule 11(a) and (d) is warranted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 16 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769399