<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1324 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769410</link>
    <description>SC dismissed the appeal due to a 309-day delay in filing, which was deemed unexplained. The Court found no compelling reason to interfere with the original Tribunal order. While rejecting the appeal on both procedural grounds and merits, the Court kept the underlying legal question open for potential future consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 08:53:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=817116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1324 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769410</link>
      <description>SC dismissed the appeal due to a 309-day delay in filing, which was deemed unexplained. The Court found no compelling reason to interfere with the original Tribunal order. While rejecting the appeal on both procedural grounds and merits, the Court kept the underlying legal question open for potential future consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769410</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>