https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43181 A High Court direction permitting withdrawal of a writ petition on the basis of a right of appeal and requiring the appeal to be decided within eight weeks was construed as a mandate to decide the matter on merits. The appellate authority wrongly treated the order as leaving limitation open and rejected the appeal as time-barred. That rejection was unjustified and was set aside, and the appeal was required to be heard and decided in accordance with law without invoking limitation as a ground for dismissal. en-us Tue, 26 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Jun 2010 15:59:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43181 A High Court direction permitting withdrawal of a writ petition on the basis of a right of appeal and requiring the appeal to be decided within eight weeks was construed as a mandate to decide the matter on merits. The appellate authority wrongly treated the order as leaving limitation open and rejected the appeal as time-barred. That rejection was unjustified and was set aside, and the appeal was required to be heard and decided in accordance with law without invoking limitation as a ground for dismissal. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 26 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43181