<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1349 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769435</link>
    <description>The ITAT Chennai upheld CIT(A)&#039;s decision granting exemption u/s 11 to a public charitable trust registered u/s 12AA. Revenue argued that trust&#039;s sale of devotional articles at markup constituted business activity, disqualifying religious purpose exemption. ITAT found trust&#039;s primary income came from donations and interest, with sale activities being incidental. Following SC precedent in ACIT vs. Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority, activities carried out at nominal cost don&#039;t automatically constitute business. AO&#039;s high markup observation was deemed fallacious as administrative expenses weren&#039;t considered. Revenue appeal dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 08:53:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=817091" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1349 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769435</link>
      <description>The ITAT Chennai upheld CIT(A)&#039;s decision granting exemption u/s 11 to a public charitable trust registered u/s 12AA. Revenue argued that trust&#039;s sale of devotional articles at markup constituted business activity, disqualifying religious purpose exemption. ITAT found trust&#039;s primary income came from donations and interest, with sale activities being incidental. Following SC precedent in ACIT vs. Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority, activities carried out at nominal cost don&#039;t automatically constitute business. AO&#039;s high markup observation was deemed fallacious as administrative expenses weren&#039;t considered. Revenue appeal dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769435</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>