<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1350 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769436</link>
    <description>The Tribunal restored matters related to tax registration and donation recognition to CIT(E) for fresh consideration. The key finding was that absence of state trust registration was a curable defect, and the assessee should be given an opportunity to produce proof of registration under RPT Act. Both section 12AB and 80G applications were directed to be reconsidered independently after subsequent registration documentation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 08:53:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=817090" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1350 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769436</link>
      <description>The Tribunal restored matters related to tax registration and donation recognition to CIT(E) for fresh consideration. The key finding was that absence of state trust registration was a curable defect, and the assessee should be given an opportunity to produce proof of registration under RPT Act. Both section 12AB and 80G applications were directed to be reconsidered independently after subsequent registration documentation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769436</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>