<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1362 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769448</link>
    <description>The SC examined a tax dispute involving capital gains exemption under Section 54 of the Income Tax Act. The court found the Assessing Officer&#039;s complete disregard of construction costs based on a valuer&#039;s report without documentary proof prima facie unsustainable. The SC directed the Assessee to file an appeal within four weeks, staying demand recovery and instructing the appellate authority to consider all evidence on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 08:53:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=817078" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1362 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769448</link>
      <description>The SC examined a tax dispute involving capital gains exemption under Section 54 of the Income Tax Act. The court found the Assessing Officer&#039;s complete disregard of construction costs based on a valuer&#039;s report without documentary proof prima facie unsustainable. The SC directed the Assessee to file an appeal within four weeks, staying demand recovery and instructing the appellate authority to consider all evidence on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>