<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1380 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769466</link>
    <description>The SC invalidated GST show cause notices and tax demands issued posthumously against a deceased proprietor. The Court held that tax proceedings cannot be initiated against a deceased person, and legal representatives must be properly notified. Notices issued after GST registration cancellation were deemed void. The Court quashed the existing notices and permitted authorities to initiate fresh proceedings against the legal representative in compliance with procedural requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 12:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=817060" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1380 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769466</link>
      <description>The SC invalidated GST show cause notices and tax demands issued posthumously against a deceased proprietor. The Court held that tax proceedings cannot be initiated against a deceased person, and legal representatives must be properly notified. Notices issued after GST registration cancellation were deemed void. The Court quashed the existing notices and permitted authorities to initiate fresh proceedings against the legal representative in compliance with procedural requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769466</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>