<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1381 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769467</link>
    <description>Uploading GST notices and assessment orders on the common portal is valid and sufficient service under the GST framework read with the Information Technology Act, with receipt occurring when the electronic record enters that portal. However, where the Department relied only on portal upload without using other available modes or ensuring a meaningful opportunity to respond, ex parte assessments were not sustained. Orders passed without consideration of replies or without personal hearing were treated as contrary to statutory hearing requirements and natural justice, leading to setting aside and remand for fresh adjudication. In matters where the assessment triggered consequential bank attachment, de-freezing followed setting aside of the assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 10:40:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=817059" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1381 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769467</link>
      <description>Uploading GST notices and assessment orders on the common portal is valid and sufficient service under the GST framework read with the Information Technology Act, with receipt occurring when the electronic record enters that portal. However, where the Department relied only on portal upload without using other available modes or ensuring a meaningful opportunity to respond, ex parte assessments were not sustained. Orders passed without consideration of replies or without personal hearing were treated as contrary to statutory hearing requirements and natural justice, leading to setting aside and remand for fresh adjudication. In matters where the assessment triggered consequential bank attachment, de-freezing followed setting aside of the assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769467</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>