<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2867 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461732</link>
    <description>Orders directing investigation under Section 156(3) CrPC, and the FIRs registered on that basis, were quashed insofar as they related to the petitioners. The High Court held that the challenge succeeded on the reasons recorded separately, with the impugned investigation orders and consequential FIRs set aside qua the petitioners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 16:05:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=817016" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2867 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461732</link>
      <description>Orders directing investigation under Section 156(3) CrPC, and the FIRs registered on that basis, were quashed insofar as they related to the petitioners. The High Court held that the challenge succeeded on the reasons recorded separately, with the impugned investigation orders and consequential FIRs set aside qua the petitioners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461732</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>