https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461736 Where the adjudication order had been set aside and that setting aside had been affirmed, continued retention of the petitioner's fixed deposits was not justified. The relief for release of the seized amount was treated as consequential to the subsisting invalidation of the adjudication order, and the connected appeal's disposal reinforced that the deposit could not be retained further. The petitioner was therefore entitled to release of the fixed deposits forthwith together with statutory interest. en-us Wed, 03 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 Apr 2025 18:58:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461736 Where the adjudication order had been set aside and that setting aside had been affirmed, continued retention of the petitioner's fixed deposits was not justified. The relief for release of the seized amount was treated as consequential to the subsisting invalidation of the adjudication order, and the connected appeal's disposal reinforced that the deposit could not be retained further. The petitioner was therefore entitled to release of the fixed deposits forthwith together with statutory interest. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 03 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461736