https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43172 A single writ petition challenging two separate stay orders was not entertained in full, and the challenge was confined to the later order. The High Court then granted conditional interim protection against the excise demand orders and the proposed auction of seized vehicles, staying their operation pending disposal of the appeals. The stay was made subject to deposit of half the duty demanded and furnishing security or a bank guarantee for the remaining amount within two months, preserving revenue protection while the appeals remained pending. en-us Mon, 13 May 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Jun 2010 15:31:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43172 A single writ petition challenging two separate stay orders was not entertained in full, and the challenge was confined to the later order. The High Court then granted conditional interim protection against the excise demand orders and the proposed auction of seized vehicles, staying their operation pending disposal of the appeals. The stay was made subject to deposit of half the duty demanded and furnishing security or a bank guarantee for the remaining amount within two months, preserving revenue protection while the appeals remained pending. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 13 May 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43172