https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43164 The High Court directed the respondent, a private limited company, to refund excise duty to a manufacturing company. Despite court orders, only a partial refund was made, leading to a writ petition. The High Court ordered the full refund within two months, but the respondent failed to comply and issued a notice based on unjust enrichment. The Court held that executive instructions cannot override judicial interpretations, emphasizing the respondent's violation of the refund order. The Court admitted the contempt petition and directed the respondent to appear, emphasizing compliance with court orders and rejecting executive interference in judicial matters. en-us Mon, 01 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Jun 2010 14:19:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43164 The High Court directed the respondent, a private limited company, to refund excise duty to a manufacturing company. Despite court orders, only a partial refund was made, leading to a writ petition. The High Court ordered the full refund within two months, but the respondent failed to comply and issued a notice based on unjust enrichment. The Court held that executive instructions cannot override judicial interpretations, emphasizing the respondent's violation of the refund order. The Court admitted the contempt petition and directed the respondent to appear, emphasizing compliance with court orders and rejecting executive interference in judicial matters. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 01 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43164