<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (2) TMI 134 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43163</link>
    <description>The court quashed the order confirming duty demand on Pulp Board against a Small Scale Industry petitioner, emphasizing the impermissibility of withdrawing exemption without notice or hearing. The absence of a speaking order explaining grounds for the demand rendered the subsequent order invalid. The judgment stressed procedural fairness, directing a fresh hearing to determine duty liability and address any withdrawal of exemption with proper notice and opportunity for the petitioner to respond. The ruling underscored the importance of due process, clarity in decisions, and upholding parties&#039; rights in excise duty matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 14:18:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81692" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (2) TMI 134 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43163</link>
      <description>The court quashed the order confirming duty demand on Pulp Board against a Small Scale Industry petitioner, emphasizing the impermissibility of withdrawing exemption without notice or hearing. The absence of a speaking order explaining grounds for the demand rendered the subsequent order invalid. The judgment stressed procedural fairness, directing a fresh hearing to determine duty liability and address any withdrawal of exemption with proper notice and opportunity for the petitioner to respond. The ruling underscored the importance of due process, clarity in decisions, and upholding parties&#039; rights in excise duty matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43163</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>