<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (5) TMI 63 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43161</link>
    <description>The court found the Customs authorities in contempt for failing to comply with court orders to refund penalties and duties to a Small Scale Industrial Unit. A Rule was issued against the authorities, requiring them to show cause for non-compliance, with potential penalties pending. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to court orders and rejected excuses based on instructions from higher authorities. Specific officers were named in the judgment, and a Rule was issued for their appearance to explain the non-compliance, underscoring the seriousness of contempt of court. The court upheld the original order for payment, refusing the request to deposit the amount in court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 14:11:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81690" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (5) TMI 63 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43161</link>
      <description>The court found the Customs authorities in contempt for failing to comply with court orders to refund penalties and duties to a Small Scale Industrial Unit. A Rule was issued against the authorities, requiring them to show cause for non-compliance, with potential penalties pending. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to court orders and rejected excuses based on instructions from higher authorities. Specific officers were named in the judgment, and a Rule was issued for their appearance to explain the non-compliance, underscoring the seriousness of contempt of court. The court upheld the original order for payment, refusing the request to deposit the amount in court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43161</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>