https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43157 Writ jurisdiction was declined because the impugned demands and orders were appealable under the statutory scheme, and the controversy depended on disputed facts. The terms of the B-2 bond, the effect of the storage circulars, the quantity of stock stored and cleared, and the plea of promissory estoppel required examination by the appellate authority rather than summary determination in writ proceedings. The plea of limitation was also not suitable for acceptance at the writ stage. The petitioners were therefore required to pursue the appellate remedy. en-us Tue, 04 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Jun 2010 13:58:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43157 Writ jurisdiction was declined because the impugned demands and orders were appealable under the statutory scheme, and the controversy depended on disputed facts. The terms of the B-2 bond, the effect of the storage circulars, the quantity of stock stored and cleared, and the plea of promissory estoppel required examination by the appellate authority rather than summary determination in writ proceedings. The plea of limitation was also not suitable for acceptance at the writ stage. The petitioners were therefore required to pursue the appellate remedy. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 04 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43157