<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1301 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769387</link>
    <description>HC set aside an income tax assessment order due to violation of natural justice principles. The court found that the tax authority failed to provide the taxpayer a requested video conferencing hearing as mandated by law. The matter was remanded for fresh assessment within three months, with a directive to issue a draft assessment order and grant the petitioner an opportunity to be heard. The error was deemed a bona fide mistake, requiring procedural correction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:14:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=816853" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1301 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769387</link>
      <description>HC set aside an income tax assessment order due to violation of natural justice principles. The court found that the tax authority failed to provide the taxpayer a requested video conferencing hearing as mandated by law. The matter was remanded for fresh assessment within three months, with a directive to issue a draft assessment order and grant the petitioner an opportunity to be heard. The error was deemed a bona fide mistake, requiring procedural correction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769387</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>