<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1300 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769386</link>
    <description>HC allowed the petition challenging a re-assessment order due to violation of natural justice. The order was passed before considering the petitioner&#039;s response, which was submitted within the prescribed timeline. Despite an existing appeal, the HC exercised discretion to intervene, set aside the order, and directed the assessing officer to conduct a fresh re-assessment within three months, ensuring procedural fairness and granting a personal hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:14:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=816852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1300 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769386</link>
      <description>HC allowed the petition challenging a re-assessment order due to violation of natural justice. The order was passed before considering the petitioner&#039;s response, which was submitted within the prescribed timeline. Despite an existing appeal, the HC exercised discretion to intervene, set aside the order, and directed the assessing officer to conduct a fresh re-assessment within three months, ensuring procedural fairness and granting a personal hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769386</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>