https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769379 Calcutta HC dismissed appeal challenging rejection of plaint seeking permanent injunction against property transfer. Appellant failed to establish legal right to suit property or disclose how he became partial owner, resulting in absence of cause of action. Court held plaintiff lacked locus standi for shareholding declaration without proper share transfer under Companies Act 2013 Section 56. Misjoinder of causes of action and inappropriate remedy selection noted, with court indicating Section 241 remedies more suitable for alleged company mismanagement. Appeal dismissed confirming suit not maintainable. en-us Mon, 21 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:14:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769379 Calcutta HC dismissed appeal challenging rejection of plaint seeking permanent injunction against property transfer. Appellant failed to establish legal right to suit property or disclose how he became partial owner, resulting in absence of cause of action. Court held plaintiff lacked locus standi for shareholding declaration without proper share transfer under Companies Act 2013 Section 56. Misjoinder of causes of action and inappropriate remedy selection noted, with court indicating Section 241 remedies more suitable for alleged company mismanagement. Appeal dismissed confirming suit not maintainable. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 21 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769379