https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769379 A plaint may be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC where it discloses no foundational cause of action, combines disconnected claims, or seeks reliefs unsupported by any legally recognisable right. The High Court noted that the pleadings did not show recorded shareholder status, any prior application or refusal attracting rectification remedies, or any coherent nexus between alleged share rights and immovable property claims. It also held that shareholder status does not by itself confer direct rights in company assets. The rejection of the plaint was therefore upheld as valid in law. en-us Mon, 21 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:14:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769379 A plaint may be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC where it discloses no foundational cause of action, combines disconnected claims, or seeks reliefs unsupported by any legally recognisable right. The High Court noted that the pleadings did not show recorded shareholder status, any prior application or refusal attracting rectification remedies, or any coherent nexus between alleged share rights and immovable property claims. It also held that shareholder status does not by itself confer direct rights in company assets. The rejection of the plaint was therefore upheld as valid in law. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 21 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769379