<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1244 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769330</link>
    <description>A person may be impleaded in arbitral proceedings if a proper Section 7 inquiry shows that the person is a party to the arbitration agreement. Prior service of a Section 21 notice on that person, or joinder in the Section 11 application, is not a jurisdictional precondition to impleadment. The tribunal&#039;s jurisdiction comes from party consent under the arbitration agreement, and Section 16 requires the tribunal to decide whether the person sought to be added is bound by that agreement. On the contractual record here, the Supreme Court found respondents 2 and 3 were bound by the arbitration clause and could be impleaded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:13:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=816815" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1244 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769330</link>
      <description>A person may be impleaded in arbitral proceedings if a proper Section 7 inquiry shows that the person is a party to the arbitration agreement. Prior service of a Section 21 notice on that person, or joinder in the Section 11 application, is not a jurisdictional precondition to impleadment. The tribunal&#039;s jurisdiction comes from party consent under the arbitration agreement, and Section 16 requires the tribunal to decide whether the person sought to be added is bound by that agreement. On the contractual record here, the Supreme Court found respondents 2 and 3 were bound by the arbitration clause and could be impleaded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769330</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>