<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1247 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769333</link>
    <description>CESTAT New Delhi ruled that digital still image video cameras qualify for basic customs duty exemption under Notification No. 25/2005-Cus dated 01.03.2005, as amended by Notification No. 15/2012 dated 17.03.2012. The tribunal followed its earlier decision in Customs Appeal No. 52218 of 2019, which was decided by the Larger Bench. The impugned order dated 28.10.2016 denying BCD exemption was set aside and appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:13:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=816812" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1247 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769333</link>
      <description>CESTAT New Delhi ruled that digital still image video cameras qualify for basic customs duty exemption under Notification No. 25/2005-Cus dated 01.03.2005, as amended by Notification No. 15/2012 dated 17.03.2012. The tribunal followed its earlier decision in Customs Appeal No. 52218 of 2019, which was decided by the Larger Bench. The impugned order dated 28.10.2016 denying BCD exemption was set aside and appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>