<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1256 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769342</link>
    <description>ITAT Hyderabad ruled in favor of the assessee on multiple transfer pricing adjustments. The tribunal deleted TP adjustments on ECB interest payments at LIBOR+500 basis points, finding them at arm&#039;s length based on precedent. Royalty payment adjustments were also deleted, holding that TPO&#039;s benefit test determining ALP at nil was arbitrary when payments were made under RBI-approved agreements. Interest adjustments on trade receivables were deleted after applying netting principle, as payables exceeded receivables substantially. The tribunal remanded CPC processing issues to AO for verification of suo-moto disallowances and directed compliance with SC precedent on employee contribution delays.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:13:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=816803" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1256 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769342</link>
      <description>ITAT Hyderabad ruled in favor of the assessee on multiple transfer pricing adjustments. The tribunal deleted TP adjustments on ECB interest payments at LIBOR+500 basis points, finding them at arm&#039;s length based on precedent. Royalty payment adjustments were also deleted, holding that TPO&#039;s benefit test determining ALP at nil was arbitrary when payments were made under RBI-approved agreements. Interest adjustments on trade receivables were deleted after applying netting principle, as payables exceeded receivables substantially. The tribunal remanded CPC processing issues to AO for verification of suo-moto disallowances and directed compliance with SC precedent on employee contribution delays.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769342</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>