<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1268 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769354</link>
    <description>Tribunal ruled that a notice issued under Section 148 on 31 July 2022 was barred by limitation, invalidating the reassessment proceedings. Relying on SC precedent in Rajeev Bansal, the Tribunal found the notice exceeded the surviving time limit calculated from the deemed notice date of 1 May 2021. Consequently, the reopening of assessment was held jurisdictionally invalid, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:13:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=816791" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1268 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769354</link>
      <description>Tribunal ruled that a notice issued under Section 148 on 31 July 2022 was barred by limitation, invalidating the reassessment proceedings. Relying on SC precedent in Rajeev Bansal, the Tribunal found the notice exceeded the surviving time limit calculated from the deemed notice date of 1 May 2021. Consequently, the reopening of assessment was held jurisdictionally invalid, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769354</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>