<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1277 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769363</link>
    <description>Where a party alleges that its counsel wrongly conceded a point of law before the High Court, the Supreme Court held that the proper course was to seek immediate clarification from the High Court; such allegations cannot be raised belatedly. The Court condemned this practice, noted that the High Court had recorded the issues as decided on concession, and dismissed the special leave petition accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 16:07:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=816782" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1277 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769363</link>
      <description>Where a party alleges that its counsel wrongly conceded a point of law before the High Court, the Supreme Court held that the proper course was to seek immediate clarification from the High Court; such allegations cannot be raised belatedly. The Court condemned this practice, noted that the High Court had recorded the issues as decided on concession, and dismissed the special leave petition accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769363</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>