<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1281 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769367</link>
    <description>BHC ruled that assignment of leasehold industrial land rights with constructed buildings for a lump-sum is not a &quot;supply of service&quot; under CGST Act. Following Gujarat HC precedent, the court held such transactions do not attract GST under Section 9. Interim relief was granted by staying adjudication orders, with the matter to be heard alongside connected writ petitions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:13:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=816778" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1281 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769367</link>
      <description>BHC ruled that assignment of leasehold industrial land rights with constructed buildings for a lump-sum is not a &quot;supply of service&quot; under CGST Act. Following Gujarat HC precedent, the court held such transactions do not attract GST under Section 9. Interim relief was granted by staying adjudication orders, with the matter to be heard alongside connected writ petitions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769367</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>